4.7 Article

Implementing Pre-Therapeutic UGT1A1 Genotyping in Clinical Practice: A Real-Life Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020204

Keywords

irinotecan; pharmacogenomics; metastatic cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of UGT1A1 genotyping and genotype-guided dose reductions on the occurrence of severe neutropenia in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers. The results show that upfront dose reductions of irinotecan cannot reduce the burden of grade >= 3 neutropenia in homozygous UGT1A1*28 carriers.
Current guidelines recommend pre-therapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping to guide irinotecan dosing, but the usefulness of this approach remains to be clarified. In 247 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers undergoing irinotecan-based chemotherapy, we prospectively performed UGT1A1*28 genotyping and we analyzed the incidence of severe neutropenia according to genotype-guided dose reductions. Overall, 28 (11.3%) and 92 (37.2%) patients were homozygous or heterozygous UGT1A1*28 carriers, respectively. Grade >= 3 neutropenia was reported in 39% of homozygous patients receiving an upfront dose reduction of irinotecan (median 40%, range 22-58%), in 20% of heterozygous or wild-type patients receiving full dose (ORvs*28/*28 genotype = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.14-1.03; p = 0.058), and in 15.3% of those receiving a reduced dose for clinical reasons (OR (vs*28/*28 genotype) = 0.28, 95% IC: 0.12-0.67; p = 0.004). Occurrence of severe neutropenia was inversely associated with dose reduction in UGT1A1*28 homozygous carriers (ORx10 unit = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.27-1.40, p = 0.249) and UGT1A1 heterozygous or wild-type patients (ORx10 unit = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.59-1.28, p = 0.478). Incidence of severe neutropenia was related to irinotecan doses and UGT1A1 polymorphisms. Upfront irinotecan dose reductions do not reduce the burden of grade >= 3 neutropenia in UGT1A1*28 homozygous carriers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available