4.7 Article

Towards Multimodal Machine Learning Prediction of Individual Cognitive Evolution in Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11121349

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; prognosis; cognition; machine learning; artificial intelligence

Funding

  1. Baekeland grant
  2. Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship [HBC.2019.2579]
  3. Biogen
  4. Genzyme
  5. FWO Flanders [1805620N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Machine learning shows promise in predicting cognitive deterioration in multiple sclerosis, but current research mainly focuses on physical deterioration, neglecting cognitive decline. This review introduces machine learning and its pitfalls, important elements for study design, and current literature on cognitive prognosis in multiple sclerosis using machine learning, aiming to advance the field.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) manifests heterogeneously among persons suffering from it, making its disease course highly challenging to predict. At present, prognosis mostly relies on biomarkers that are unable to predict disease course on an individual level. Machine learning is a promising technique, both in terms of its ability to combine multimodal data and through the capability of making personalized predictions. However, most investigations on machine learning for prognosis in MS were geared towards predicting physical deterioration, while cognitive deterioration, although prevalent and burdensome, remained largely overlooked. This review aims to boost the field of machine learning for cognitive prognosis in MS by means of an introduction to machine learning and its pitfalls, an overview of important elements for study design, and an overview of the current literature on cognitive prognosis in MS using machine learning. Furthermore, the review discusses new trends in the field of machine learning that might be adopted for future studies in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available