4.7 Article

Advances and Personalized Approaches in the Frontline Treatment of T-Cell Lymphomas

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020267

Keywords

mature T- and NK-cell neoplasms; peripheral T-cell lymphoma; brentuximab vedotin; histone deacetylase inhibitors; lenalidomide; azacitidine; crizotinib; chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy

Funding

  1. Hematology Clinical Research Training Program
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [T32 HL07439]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a rare and aggressive subset of lymphomas with poor response to traditional chemotherapy, but have shown improved outcomes with newer targeted therapies. FDA-approved novel agents have demonstrated superior efficacy in specific PTCL subtypes, leading to potential expansion of frontline treatment strategies.
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a rare and heterogenous subset of non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by an aggressive clinical course. Historically, the treatment of PTCLs have been analogous to that of aggressive B-cell lymphomas; however, it has been well-established that overall responses and complete remission rates are far inferior using near-identical chemotherapy strategies. Recently, there has been a plethora of newer agents designed to target distinguishing cellular and molecular features of specific PTCL subtypes. These agents have been proven to yield superior anti-lymphoma responses and, in some cases, overall survival in the relapsed, refractory, and frontline treatment setting. In this review, we will summarize and highlight the most influential clinical trials leading to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of several novel therapeutic agents against PTCL, with an emphasis on emerging studies and strategies to expand their potential use in the frontline treatment setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available