4.7 Article

The remarkable visual system of a Cretaceous crab

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103579

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Paleontological Society N. Gary Lane Student Research Award
  2. Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies (YIBS)
  3. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1856679]
  5. Fondo Corrigan-ACGGP-ARES (Colombia)
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1856679] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes the details of the eyes of the Cretaceous crab Callichimaera perplexa, which had remarkably large eyes and a unique body form. It is the first post-Paleozoic arthropod known to preserve both internal and external eye structures. The research shows that C. perplexa was a highly visual predator that inhabited well-lit environments.
True crabs (Brachyura) are one of the few groups of arthropods to evolve several types of compound eye, the origins and early evolution of which are obscure. Here, we describe details of the eyes of the Cretaceous brachyuran Callichimaera perplexa, which possessed remarkably large eyes and a highly disparate body form among brachyurans. The eyes of C. perplexa preserve internal optic neuropils and external corneal elements, and it is the first known post-Paleozoicarthropod to preserve both. Additionally, a series of specimens of C. perplexa preserve both the eyes and carapace, allowing for the calculation of the optical growth rate. C. perplexa shows the fastest optical growth rate compared with a sample of 14 species of extant brachyurans. The growth series of C. perplexa, in combination with the calculation of the interommatidial angle and eye parameter, demonstrates that it was a highly visual predator that inhabited well-litenvironments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available