4.7 Article

A nonhuman primate model of vertical sleeve gastrectomy facilitates mechanistic and translational research in human obesity

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103421

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Jay Phillips Chair
  2. Robert and Katherine Goodale Chair in Minimally Invasive Surgery
  3. University of Minnesota Clinical Immersion Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study established a translational nonhuman primate model of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) that mimics the complexity and outcomes seen in humans, demonstrating that VSG confers durable metabolic benefits and weight loss. Additionally, VSG was shown to be associated with early, weight-independent increases in bile acids, short-chain fatty acids, and a reduction in visceral adipose tissue inflammation.
The obesity epidemic significantly contributes to overall morbidity and mortality. Bariatric surgery is the fold standard treatment for obesity and metabolic dysfunction, yet the mechanisms by which it exerts metabolic benefit remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate a model of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) in nonhuman primates (NHP) that mimics the complexity and outcomes in humans. We also show that VSG confers weight loss and durable metabolic benefit, where equivalent caloric intake in shams resulted in significant weight gain following surgery. Furthermore, we show that VSG is associated with early, weight-independent increases in bile acids, short-chain fatty acids, and reduced visceral adipose tissue (VAT) inflammation with a polarization of VAT-resident immunocytes toward highly regulatory myeloid cells and Tregs. These data demonstrate that this strongly translational NHP model can be used to interrogate factors driving successful intervention to unravel the interplay between physiologic systems and improve therapies for obesity and metabolic syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available