4.7 Article

Spotlight on alternative frame coding: Two long overlapping genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa are translated and under purifying selection

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103844

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. TUM University Library Publishing Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discovery of overlapping genes with significant coding overlaps has revolutionized our understanding of genomic complexity. In this study, two unusually long antisense open reading frames were found in a pathogenic bacterium, and their transcription and translation were confirmed. Proteomics analysis revealed regulation of protein abundances, suggesting biological functionality. These findings highlight a potentially unexplored dimension of prokaryotic genomes.
The existence of overlapping genes (OLGs) with significant coding overlaps revolutionizes our understanding of genomic complexity. We report two exceptionally long (957 nt and 1536 nt), evolutionarily novel, translated antisense open reading frames (ORFs) embedded within annotated genes in the pathogenic Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Both OLG pairs show sequence features consistent with being genes and transcriptional signals in RNA sequencing. Translation of both OLGs was confirmed by ribosome profiling and mass spectrometry. Quantitative proteomics of samples taken during different phases of growth revealed regulation of protein abundances, implying biological functionality. Both OLGs are taxonomically restricted, and likely arose by overprinting within the genus. Evidence for purifying selection further supports functionality. The OLGs reported here, designated olg1 and olg2, are the longest yet proposed in prokaryotes and are among the best attested in terms of translation and evolutionary constraint. These results highlight a potentially large unexplored dimension of prokaryotic genomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available