4.7 Article

Fooled twice: People cannot detect deepfakes but think they can

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103364

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Priority Area Behavioural Economics of the University of Amsterdam [202006110906]
  2. Max Planck Institute for Human Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deepfakes pose challenges for verifying online content authenticity, as people struggle to reliably detect deepfakes and tend to mistake them for authentic videos. People often overestimate their detection abilities, leading to overconfidence and susceptibility to the influence of deepfake content.
Hyper-realistic manipulations of audio-visual content, i.e., deepfakes, present new challenges for establishing the veracity of online content. Research on the human impact of deepfakes remains sparse. In a pre-registered behavioral experiment (N = 210), we show that (1) people cannot reliably detect deepfakes and (2) neither raising awareness nor introducing financial incentives improves their detection accuracy. Zeroing in on the underlying cognitive processes, we find that (3) people are biased toward mistaking deepfakes as authentic videos (rather than vice versa) and (4) they overestimate their own detection abilities. Together, these results suggest that people adopt a seeing-is-believingheuristic for deepfake detection while being overconfident in their (low) detection abilities. The combination renders people particularly susceptible to be influenced by deepfake content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available