4.7 Article

Spines and baskets in apex predatory sea scorpions uncover unique feeding strategies using 3D-kinematics

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103662

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Me-2683/10-1]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP200102005]
  3. UNE Postdoctoral Research Fellowship
  4. Australian Research Council [DP200102005] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 3D model-based kinematic analysis reveals that the appendages of early Palaeozoic sea scorpions were used for hunting, including capturing, immobilizing, and consuming prey. This research method provides a more comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of these ancient creatures and highlights their important role in past ecosystems.
Megalograptidae and Mixopteridae with elongate, spinose prosomal appendages are unique early Palaeozoic sea scorpions (Eurypterida). These features were presumably used for hunting, an untested hypothesis. Here, we present 3D model-based kinematic range of motion (ROM) analyses of Megalograptus ohioensis and Mixopterus kiaeri and compare these to modern analogs. This comparison confirms that the eurypterid appendages were likely raptorial, used in grabbing and holding prey for consumption. The Megalograptus ohioensis model illustrates notable Appendage III flexibility, indicating hypertrophied spines on Appendage III may have held prey, while Appendage II likely ripped immobilized prey. Mixopterus kiaeri, conversely, constructed a capture basket with Appendage III, and impaled prey with Appendage II elongated spines. Thus, megalograptid and mixopterid frontalmost appendages constructed a double basket system prior to moving dismembered prey to the chelicerae. Such 3D kinematic modeling presents a more complete understanding of these peculiar euchelicerates and highlights their possible position within past ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available