4.7 Article

Signal processing capacity of the cellular sensory machinery regulates the accuracy of chemotaxis under complex cues

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103242

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA 254110, P30 CA023168]
  2. National Science Foundation [PHY-1945018, MCB-1936761]
  3. Purdue Center for Cancer Research
  4. Purdue University Libraries Open Access Publishing Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the regulation of cellular chemotactic performance in sensing and deciphering multiple chemical cues, suggesting that the signal processing capacity plays a crucial role in determining migration direction. The experimental findings demonstrate the suppression of chemotactic performance of cancer cells under complex cues, shedding light on the significance of signal processing capacity in cellular sensory machinery.
Chemotaxis is ubiquitous in many biological processes, but it still remains elusive how cells sense and decipher multiple chemical cues. In this study, we postulate a hypothesis that the chemotactic performance of cells under complex cues is regulated by the signal processing capacity of the cellular sensory machinery. The underlying rationale is that cells in vivo should be able to sense and process multiple chemical cues, whose magnitude and compositions are entangled, to determine their migration direction. We experimentally show that the combination of transforming growth factor-4 and epidermal growth factor suppresses the chemotactic performance of cancer cells using independent receptors to sense the two cues. Based on this observation, we develop a biophysical framework suggesting that the antagonism is caused by the saturation of the signal processing capacity but not by the mutual repression. Our framework suggests the significance of the signal processing capacity in the cellular sensory machinery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available