4.7 Article

Long-Term Pharmacological Inhibition of the Activity of All NOS Isoforms Rather Than Genetic Knock-Out of Endothelial NOS Leads to Impaired Spatial Learning and Memory in C57BL/6 Mice

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9121905

Keywords

arterial stiffness; cognitive decline; nitric oxide synthase

Funding

  1. University of Antwerp (GOA-BOF) [33932]
  2. Research Foundation-Flanders
  3. Medical Research Foundation Antwerp
  4. Neurosearch Antwerp

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the association between arterial stiffness and cognitive decline by introducing arterial stiffness in genetic and pharmacological NO dysfunction models. The findings demonstrate that non-selective inhibition of NOS activity leads to cardiac dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and decline in hippocampal-dependent learning and memory, highlighting the importance of neuronal NOS in both cardiovascular and neurological pathophysiology.
Increasing epidemiological and experimental evidence points to a link between arterial stiffness and rapid cognitive decline. However, the underlying mechanism linking the two diseases is still unknown. The importance of nitric oxide synthases in both diseases is well-defined. In this study, we introduced arterial stiffness in both genetic (eNOS(-/-), endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockout) and pharmacological (N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) treatment) NO dysfunction models to study their association with cognitive decline. Our findings demonstrate that the non-selective inhibition of NOS activity with L-NAME induces cardiac dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and a decline in hippocampal-dependent learning and memory. This outcome demonstrates the importance of neuronal NOS (nNOS) in both cardiovascular and neurological pathophysiology and its potential contribution in the convergence between arterial stiffness and cognitive decline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available