4.7 Article

The Identification of Prohibitin in the Rat Heart Mitochondria in Heart Failure

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9121793

Keywords

rat heart mitochondria (RHM); heart failure (HF); prohibitin (PHB); astaxantin (AX); isoproterenol (ISO); oxidative stress; oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)

Funding

  1. RFBR-grant [20-04-00131, 20-015-00072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified a decrease in the level of PHB in rat heart mitochondria with heart failure, and found that astaxanthin increased PHB content, suggesting a potential protective role. The interaction between PHB and other mitochondrial proteins in respiratory chain complexes was investigated under experimental conditions to understand this protective action.
Mitochondria are considered the main organelles in the cell. They play an important role in both normal and abnormal heart function. There is a supramolecular organization between the complexes of the respiratory chain (supercomplexes (SCs)), which are involved in mitochondrial respiration. Prohibitins (PHBs) participate in the regulation of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) activity and interact with some subunits of the OXPHOS complexes. In this study, we identified a protein whose level was decreased in the mitochondria of the heart in rats with heart failure. This protein was PHB. Isoproterenol (ISO) has been used as a compound to induce heart failure in rats. We observed that astaxanthin (AX) increased the content of PHB in rat heart mitochondria isolated from ISO-injected rats. Since it is known that PHB forms complexes with some mitochondrial proteins and proteins that are part of the complexes of the respiratory chain, the change in the levels of these proteins was investigated under our experimental conditions. We hypothesized that PHB may be a target for the protective action of AX.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available