4.7 Article

Regulation of biocathode microbial fuel cell performance with respect to azo dye degradation and electricity generation via the selection of anodic inoculum

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 5141-5150

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.114

Keywords

Textile dyeing sludge; Municipal sludge; Azo dye decolorization; Microbial fuel cell; Electricity generation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [51108186]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong, China [2014A020216042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biocathode microbial fuel cell performances with respect to azo dye decolorization and electricity generation were examined using two anodic inoculums, textile dyeing sludge (MFC-I) and municipal sludge (MFC-M), to determine the potential performance regulation of the MFC via the selection of anodic inoculum. The results showed that the MFC-I exhibited excellent performance in Congo red decolorization, whereas the MFC-M performed well in electricity generation. The MFC-I achieved fast Congo red decolorization with a first-order rate constant k = 0.0501, which was 34% higher than that obtained by MFC-M (k = 0.0375). The MFC-M exhibited 3.22 times higher power output (29 mW/m(2) vs. 9 mW/m2) and 38.0% lower anode impedance (749 Omega vs. 1208 Omega) compared to MFC-I. The functional stains isolated from the anodic biofilm of MFC-I were identified as Pseudomonas sp. and Aquamicrobium sp., while isolates from MFC-M belonged to Pseudomonas sp. and Bacillus sp. Four selected isolates were proved to be exoelectrogens and bacterial decolorizer simultaneously but exhibited different bioelectrocatalytic activities and dye decolorizing capabilities, which could partly explain the performance difference between the two MFCs with different anodic inocula. Copyright (C) 2016, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available