4.5 Article

Microplastics alter feeding strategies of a coral reef organism

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 131-139

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lol2.10237

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Minerva Foundation
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing marine microplastic pollution has negative effects on organismal physiology and ecosystem functioning. However, the potential responses of large benthic foraminifera (LBF) are largely unknown. This study found that the LBF species Amphistegina gibbosa can selectively feed on Artemia and avoid pristine microplastic particles, but conditioned microplastic has a similar feeding interaction rate as Artemia. This suggests that microplastics with longer residence times may have a larger impact on facultative detritivores.
Increasing marine microplastic pollution has detrimentally impacted organismal physiology and ecosystem functioning. While previous studies document negative effects of microplastics on coral reef animals, the potential responses of organisms such as large benthic foraminifera (LBF) are largely unknown. Here, we document the impact of microplastics on heterotrophic feeding behavior of LBF. Specimens of Amphistegina gibbosa were incubated in three experimental treatments: (1) Artemia sp. nauplii only; (2) pristine microplastic particles only; and (3) choice of nauplii and pristine microplastic. Feeding responses were evaluated 24 h after initiation of treatments. A separate experiment was conducted to compare the effect of conditioned vs. pristine microplastic. Our results indicate that A. gibbosa is able to selectively feed on Artemia, avoiding interactions with pristine microplastic. However, the presence of conditioned microplastic causes similar feeding interaction rates as with Artemia. This suggests that microplastics with longer residence times may have a larger impact on facultative detritivores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available