4.5 Article

Reconciling models and measurements of marsh vulnerability to sea level rise

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 140-149

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lol2.10230

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey Land Change Science Climate RD Program
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  3. NSF LTER [1832221]
  4. NSF EAR-CAREER [1654374]
  5. NSF EAR-GLD [1529245]
  6. NSF OCE-SEES [1426981]
  7. U.S. Geological Survey Ecosystems Mission Area
  8. Division Of Earth Sciences
  9. Directorate For Geosciences [1529245] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combines data from marshes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast and around the world to show that 70% of variability in marsh accretion rates can be explained by suspended sediment concentration and tidal range. The results help bridge the gap between models and measurements and confirm that sediment supply is the key determinant of wetland vulnerability at continental scales.
Tidal marsh survival in the face of sea level rise (SLR) and declining sediment supply often depends on the ability of marshes to build soil vertically. However, numerical models typically predict survival under rates of SLR that far exceed field-based measurements of vertical accretion. Here, we combine novel measurements from seven U.S. Atlantic Coast marshes and data from 70 additional marshes from around the world to illustrate that-over continental scales-70% of variability in marsh accretion rates can be explained by suspended sediment concentratin (SSC) and spring tidal range (TR). Apparent discrepancies between models and measurements can be explained by differing responses in high marshes and low marshes, the latter of which accretes faster for a given SSC and TR. Together these results help bridge the gap between models and measurements, and reinforce the paradigm that sediment supply is the key determinant of wetland vulnerability at continental scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available