4.7 Article

Performance Improvement of Gallium-Doped Passivated Emitter and Rear Cells by Two-Step Bias Application

Journal

SOLAR RRL
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202100738

Keywords

bias applications; gallium doping; hydrogen behaviors; PERC solar cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62025403, 61974129, 61721005]
  2. Visiting Scholars Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials [SKL2020-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The two-step postfiring bias treatment can significantly enhance the efficiency of commercial gallium-doped PERC solar cells by up to 0.1%, with positive biasing followed by negative biasing resulting in an average efficiency enhancement of around 0.05% each. A new model involving hydrogen behavior under electric field is proposed to explain the mechanism behind the efficiency improvement from the bias treatments.
Passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells have dominated the photovoltaic market in recent years. Continuously improving the efficiency of PERC solar cells is of great importance to enable the goal of low electricity cost, which is cheaper than the cost of thermal power generation. Herein, it is demonstrated that a two-step postfiring bias treatment is able to evidently enhance the efficiency of commercial gallium-doped PERC solar cells by up to 0.1% absolute. In detail, the first-step bias treatment is done by forward biasing the PERC solar cells at 12 A and 200 degrees C for 60 min, resulting in an average efficiency enhancement at around 0.05% absolute. The second-step bias treatment is done by reverse biasing the PERC solar cells at -0.1 or -0.2 V and at the elevated temperatures for certain times, leading to another average efficiency enhancement at around 0.05% absolute. To explore the mechanism underlying the two-step bias treatments on improving cell efficiency, a new model in light of hydrogen behavior under electric field is proposed to explain this phenomenon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available