4.8 Review

Analysis and Performance Assessment of the Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing Data Workflow: Currently Available Tools and a Practical Guide to Advance DNA Methylation Studies

Journal

SMALL METHODS
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202101251

Keywords

alignment algorithm comparison; DNA methylation; library preparation methods; methylation data analysis pipeline; whole genome bisulfite sequencing

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA223490, R01CA230514]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA methylation is a phenomenon associated with transcriptional repression, genomic imprinting, stem cell differentiation, embryonic development, and inflammation. Aberrant DNA methylation can indicate disease states, making the understanding of the prevalence and location of DNA methylation in the human genome important. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) is a high-throughput method for analyzing DNA methylation, and this review compares and introduces the detailed experimental methodology of WGBS.
DNA methylation is associated with transcriptional repression, genomic imprinting, stem cell differentiation, embryonic development, and inflammation. Aberrant DNA methylation can indicate disease states, including cancer and neurological disorders. Therefore, the prevalence and location of 5-methylcytosine in the human genome is a topic of interest. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) is a high-throughput method for analyzing DNA methylation. This technique involves library preparation, alignment, and quality control. Advancements in epigenetic technology have led to an increase in DNA methylation studies. This review compares the detailed experimental methodology of WGBS using accessible and up-to-date analysis tools. Practical codes for WGBS data processing are included as a general guide to assist progress in DNA methylation studies through a comprehensive case study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available