4.8 Article

Delithiation-driven topotactic reaction endows superior cycling performances for high-energy-density FeSx (1 ≤ x ≤ 1.14) cathodes

Journal

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 579-584

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.036

Keywords

Li-free cathodes; Transition metal sulfides; High energy density; Conversion reaction; Topotactic reaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52072061]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [ZYGX2019Z008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports a topotactic reaction as a method to improve cycling performance of high-energy-density lithium metal battery cathodes. A series of transition metal monosulfides are synthesized and FeS is found to undergo fully reversible reaction, leading to complete reaction through a topotactic reaction. Experimental results show FeS exhibits a capacity retention of 82% after 700 cycles at 1C, demonstrating excellent battery performance.
Conversion-type materials are promising high-energy-density lithium metal battery cathodes. However, they suffer from severe capacity decay and poor cycling performance due to phase transformations. In this study, we report a topotactic reaction to overcome this issue. A series of transition metal monosulfides (MSs = TiS, VS, CrS, MnS, FeS, CoS, NiS, and CuS) are synthesized. FeS is found to be fully reversible between Fe and Li2S. Delithiation on the Li2S vertical bar Fe heterojunction creates a new FeS phase via a topotatic reaction, enabling FeS to undergo a complete reaction. FeS demonstrates a capacity retention of 82% after 700 cycles at 1C in the voltage window of 1.0-3.0 V, remaining 407 mAh g(-1). A pouch cell using Fe7S8 (FeSx, x = 1.14) as the cathode is found to exhibit a superior gravimetric energy density of 389 Wh kg(-1). These findings highlight the importance of structural continuity to guide good cycling stabilities for conversion-type cathodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available