4.8 Review

Toward high-energy Mn-based disordered-rocksalt Li-ion cathodes

Journal

JOULE
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 53-91

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.11.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSERC [NSERC RGPIN-2020-04463, NSERC RGPAS-2020-00115]
  2. McGill Start-Up grant
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and Information & Communication Technology [NRF-2020R1A2C1101851]
  4. Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and Information & Communication Technology [2017K1A4A3015437]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent development of high-capacity DRX cathodes offers new opportunities for low-cost and high-energy Li-ion batteries. Mn-based DRX materials show promising performance, but face challenges such as limited cycling kinetics and poor capacity retention.
The recent development of high-capacity disordered-rocksalt (DRX) cathodes has ushered in new opportunities toward low-cost and high-energy Li-ion batteries. In particular, Mn-based DRX materials in which Mn serves as the primary redox-active transition metal have shown the most promising performance, with capacity and specific energy surpassing those of more established cathode materials. However, there remain critical challenges for these materials to become practical alternatives to conventional cathodes, such as limited cycling kinetics, which require pulverized particle morphology to achieve high capacity or poor capacity retention. Herein, we summarize the current understanding of the operating principles, failure mechanisms, synthesis and processing, microstructure, and performance of the Mn-based DRX materials. From this understanding, we perform a critical analysis of the challenges and opportunities toward high-energy Mn-based DRX for sustainable Li-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available