4.7 Article

A Non-Iterative Method for the Difference of Means on the Lie Group of Symmetric Positive-Definite Matrices

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10020255

Keywords

log-Euclidean metric; differential geometry; mean matrix; point cloud denoising; Lie group of symmetric positive-definite matrices

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a non-iterative method for calculating the log-Euclidean distance between a symmetric positive-definite matrix and the mean matrix. By employing log-Euclidean metrics, the calculations are simplified and accelerated. The method does not require computing the mean matrix and retains the usual Euclidean operations.
A non-iterative method for the difference of means is presented to calculate the log-Euclidean distance between a symmetric positive-definite matrix and the mean matrix on the Lie group of symmetric positive-definite matrices. Although affine-invariant Riemannian metrics have a perfect theoretical framework and avoid the drawbacks of the Euclidean inner product, their complex formulas also lead to sophisticated and time-consuming algorithms. To make up for this limitation, log-Euclidean metrics with simpler formulas and faster calculations are employed in this manuscript. Our new approach is to transform a symmetric positive-definite matrix into a symmetric matrix via logarithmic maps, and then to transform the results back to the Lie group through exponential maps. Moreover, the present method does not need to compute the mean matrix and retains the usual Euclidean operations in the domain of matrix logarithms. In addition, for some randomly generated positive-definite matrices, the method is compared using experiments with that induced by the classical affine-invariant Riemannian metric. Finally, our proposed method is applied to denoise the point clouds with high density noise via the K-means clustering algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available