4.7 Article

Comparison of the Average Kappa Coefficients of Two Binary Diagnostic Tests with Missing Data

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 9, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math9212834

Keywords

EM algorithm; partial verification; SEM algorithm

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article compares the average kappa coefficients of two binary diagnostic tests in situations of partial disease verification. Computational methods such as the EM algorithm and the SEM algorithm are applied to estimate parameters and variances-covariances. Simulation experiments show that the proposed method has good asymptotic behavior for hypothesis tests.
The average kappa coefficient of a binary diagnostic test is a parameter that measures the average beyond-chance agreement between the diagnostic test and the gold standard. This parameter depends on the accuracy of the diagnostic test and also on the disease prevalence. This article studies the comparison of the average kappa coefficients of two binary diagnostic tests when the gold standard is not applied to all individuals in a random sample. In this situation, known as partial disease verification, the disease status of some individuals is a missing piece of data. Assuming that the missing data mechanism is missing at random, the comparison of the average kappa coefficients is solved by applying two computational methods: the EM algorithm and the SEM algorithm. With the EM algorithm the parameters are estimated and with the SEM algorithm their variances-covariances are estimated. Simulation experiments have been carried out to study the sizes and powers of the hypothesis tests studied, obtaining that the proposed method has good asymptotic behavior. A function has been written in R to solve the proposed problem, and the results obtained have been applied to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available