4.6 Article

Design of bolted ball-cylinder joints under different load types

Journal

STRUCTURES
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages 214-229

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.073

Keywords

Design method; Bolted ball-cylinder joints; Finite element simulation; Load bearing capacity; Theoretical derivation

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030310547]
  2. College Students' Innovative EntrepreneurialTraining Plan Program of Guangdong University of Technology [xj202111845381]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a study on bolted ball-cylinder (BBC) joint, using finite element analysis to investigate the structural behavior, verifying the model's reliability through experimental results, and proposing empirical formulas to predict the ultimate load capacity.
This paper presents an FE and theoretical study on bolted ball-cylinder (BBC) joint, which mainly consists of a circular tube welded to a solid hemisphere. As a new type of jointing system for non-purlin grid structures, BBC joints may be subjected to compressive, tensile and bending loads. A non-linear FE model was developed and its reliability was verified by the experimental results from existing literature. For a design purpose, the FE model was improved by removing the additional constraints that needed during the test and modifying the material constitutive model. Failure modes, typical load-displacement relationships and stress distributions were studied based on the FE simulations. Parametrical study was conducted to investigate the influence of key parameters, such as diameter, thickness, height of the circular tube, width and height of the tubular beam, on the structural behaviour of BBC joints under various loading scenarios. Finally, empirical formulas were proposed to predict the ultimate load capacity of BBC joints and the prediction agreed well with the FE results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available