4.6 Article

Seismic response control of bridges with nonlinear tuned vibration absorbers

Journal

STRUCTURES
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 262-274

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.066

Keywords

Bridges; Earthquake engineering; Nonlinear tuned vibration absorbers (n-TVAs); Optimum design; Structural control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the seismic response control of bridges using nonlinear tuned vibration absorbers (n-TVAs) by comparing them with optimum linear TVAs (o-TVAs) and elasto-plastic bilinear TVAs (bn-TVAs). Results show that n-TVAs are as effective as o-TVAs in controlling structural response, providing a more economical solution without the need for additional dashpots, although their stroke is comparable to that of o-TVAs.
The paper investigates seismic response control of bridges with nonlinear tuned vibration absorbers (n-TVAs). A three-span continuous bridge is used as case study. The n-TVAs are designed to act in both longitudinal and transverse directions of the bridge. The n-TVAs are modelled as inelastic springs with bilinear hysteretic behavior. A simple and effective method to design the parameters of the n-TVAs for controlling structural displacement is presented. The performance of the proposed n-TVAs is compared with the optimum linear TVAs (o-TVAs) and elasto-plastic bilinear TVAs (bn-TVAs). The results show that the n-TVAs are at least as effective as o-TVAs in controlling structural response. Because the n-TVAs do not require additional dashpots like the oTVAs, they provide a more economical solution. It is observed that although effective in controlling structural response, their stroke is of the same order as that of o-TVAs. Addition of a viscous dashpot to the device is found to reduce their stroke, although accompanied by an inherent detrimental effect on the structural control performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available