4.2 Article

Quality of Life after Rectal Cancer Resection Comparing Anterior Resection, Abdominoperineal Resection, and Complicated Cases

Journal

VISCERAL MEDICINE
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 138-149

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000520945

Keywords

Quality of life; Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision; Low anterior resection; Abdominoperineal resection; Stoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the quality of life (QoL) after low anterior resection (AR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer (RC), with a special analysis of AR patients with a stoma. The results showed that AR patients had higher overall health status, fewer symptoms, and better functionality compared to APR and AR patients with a stoma. Radiotherapy also had a significant impact on reducing QoL in all patients.
Introduction: Compared to abdominoperineal resection (APR), sphincter preservation using low anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer (RC) implies the risk of impaired functional outcome and postoperative complications associated with a persistent or additionally required ostomy. The aim of our study was to compare quality of life (QoL) after AR and APR with a special separate analysis of AR patients with a stoma. Methods: QoL of 84 APR, 356 AR, and 29 AR patients with complications and an additional stoma, termed converted therapy (COT) patients, was compared with regard to groups and effect of radiotherapy (RT). All patients received rectal resection between 1998 and 2013, and 47% of the patients had RT. QoL was assessed using extended EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR38 questionnaires. Results: Questionnaires from 57 APR, 165 AR, and 25 COT patients alive were evaluated after a median time of 4 years after surgery. Global health status was equally high in AR and APR patients (score: 67), whereas COT patients turned out with a significantly lower score of 50 (p = 0.007). Compared to APR and COT, AR patients revealed less symptoms and higher functionality, especially for physical, role, and social functioning (p < 0.001). The reduction of QoL instances was significant in the COT group and in all patients treated by RT. Conclusion: QoL after RC resection may be further improved by avoiding additionally required ostomy after AR but also RT by a better individual selection of qualified patients. Qualification parameters urgently need to be defined by prospective studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available