4.5 Article

Fusarium casha sp. nov. and F. curculicola sp. nov. in the Fusarium fujikuroi Species Complex Isolated from Amaranthus cruentus and Three Weevil Species in South Africa

Journal

DIVERSITY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d13100472

Keywords

Amaranthus cruentus; Fusarium casha; Fusarium curculicola; phytopathogen; weevils

Funding

  1. Cluster Programme of the University of the Free State

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified two novel Fusarium species, F. casha and F. curculicola, with potential pathogenicity to A. cruentus. Further research is needed to understand the association between these species and weevils, as well as the role of weevils in disease development in A. cruentus.
Trials are currently being conducted in South Africa to establish Amaranthus cruentus as a new pseudocereal crop. During recent surveys, Fusarium species were associated with weevil damage in A. cruentus fields. Preliminary studies showed that some of these Fusarium species grouped into two distinct clades within the F. fujikuroi species complex. The aim of this study was to characterize these isolates based on the morphology and phylogeny of the translation elongation factor 1 alpha (TEF1 alpha) gene region, ss-tubulin 2 (ssT) gene region and RNA polymerase II subunit (RPB2), and to determine if these isolates are pathogenic to A. cruentus. Phylogenetic and morphological studies showed that these two clades represent two novel species described here as F. casha and F. curculicola. Both species were shown to have the potential to be pathogenic to A. cruentus during routine greenhouse inoculation tests. While isolations indicate a possible association between these two species and weevils, further research is needed to understand this association and the role of weevils in disease development involving F. casha and F. curculicola in A. cruentus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available