4.7 Article

Experimental study on seismic behavior of reinforced concrete shear walls with low shear span ratio

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103602

Keywords

Low shear span ratio; Reinforced concrete shear walls; Seismic behavior; Quasi-static test

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project, China [2014ZX06902011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the seismic behavior of squat reinforced concrete shear walls with different shear span ratios (SSR). It found various failure modes under different SSR conditions and evaluated the conservatism and accuracy of shear strength formulas in different design codes.
Shear span ratio (SSR) is a key factor affecting the structural and seismic behavior of shear walls. Existing experimental studies on the seismic behavior of shear walls with SSR less than 1.0 are limited. In order to study the seismic behavior of squat reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls, 16 specimens (of which four specimens were subjected to coupled tension-shear force) with SSR of 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 were fabricated and subjected to horizontal low-cycle repeated loading tests. The parameters considered in the test included the SSR, axial load ratio (ALR), and horizontal reinforcement ratio (HRR). The seismic behavior of the 16 squat RC shear wall specimens was investigated by analyzing their failure modes, hysteretic behaviors, and energy dissipation capacities. This study also assessed the validity of shear strength capacity formulae for shear walls with low SSR adopted in the design codes used currently in China, America, Canada and Europe. Five failure modes were observed in the 16 specimens, namely, diagonal compression-sliding (DCS) failure, diagonal compression (DC) failure, shear-bending (SB) failure, shear sliding (SS) failure, and tensile shear (TS) failure. For the specimens under compression, the failure mode of the specimens changed from shear failure to shear-bending failure with the increase in SSR. Also, the shear strength capacity was significantly reduced as SSR increased, while the deformation capacity and energy dissipation capacity increased significantly. The specimens under tension with SSR of 0.5 suffered TS failure. Vertical tension significantly decreased the shear strength capacity and energy dissipation capacity of the shear walls, however their ductility factor and ultimate displacement increased. The increase in ALR from 0.3 to 0.5 enhanced the shear strength capacity of the shear walls but the energy dissipation capacity reduced. With the increase in HRR, the shear strength capacity and energy dissipation capacity of the shear walls improved slightly. The shear strength capacities of shear walls assessed according to the four design codes were all conservative for the specimens suffering DC failure and DCS failure, while the opposite was true for the specimens with TS failure. For the specimens suffering SB failure, only the ACI 318-19 calculation results were not conservative compared to the test results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available