4.7 Article

On the estimation of marbles weathering by thermal action using drilling resistance

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102494

Keywords

Marble; Drilling resistance; Weathering; Thermal degradation; Artificial aging

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [UIDB/00100/2020, PTDC/ECI-EGC/29006/2017]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/ECI-EGC/29006/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the thermal behavior of marbles, finding that ultrasonic pulse velocity decreases with increasing porosity in sound and decayed marbles. It proposed using drilling resistance to characterize technical properties and degradation levels of marbles, providing empirical relations for on-site estimation. Additionally, a classification based on drilling resistance was suggested to assess the weathering level of marbles.
Marbles are widely present in noteworthy constructions but are prone to decay due to the anisotropic thermal behavior of constituent minerals. In this paper, fine to coarse sound marbles possessing diverse technical properties were subjected to different artificial heating protocols to simulate varied degradation scenarios. The ultrasonic pulse velocity of sound and decayed marbles decreases exponentially with increasing porosity which is in line with the relationships found in the literature for other marble varieties. Drilling resistance (DR) revealed potential to characterize a wide diversity of marbles/degradation levels since data was in straight agreement with technical properties of interest for damage diagnosis and conservation purposes. Therefore, empirical relations based on DR results are provided to estimate technical properties of marbles on-site. Besides, this work proposes a classification, based on DR, to assess the weathering level of marbles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available