4.7 Article

Incorporation of crumb rubber and air-entraining agent in ultra-lightweight cementitious composite: Evaluation of mechanical and acoustic properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103034

Keywords

Ultra-lightweight cementitious composite; Crumb rubber; Air-entraining agent; Perlite microspheres; Acoustic properties

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia [FP056-2018A (FRGS/1/2018/TK06/UM/02/1)]
  2. Skim Latihan Akademik IPTA (SLAI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research shows that the combination of crumb rubber and air-entraining agent can effectively reduce the density of cementitious composite and improve its sound absorption performance. The use of CR and AEA together in ULCC production is efficient in reducing density and enhancing acoustic performance.
This research describes the usage of crumb rubber (CR) and air-entraining agent (AEA) to further reduce the density of lightweight cementitious composite into ultra-lightweight cementitious composites (ULCC), which has density lower than 800 kg/m(3). The effects of CR and AEA on workability, compressive strength, flexural strength, sound absorption and sound transmission loss of ULCC are evaluated. The dry densities of the ULCC produced are in the range of 711-857 kg/m(3). Compared with the control mix, the addition of 1% of AEA and inclusion 15% of CR have similar effect in reducing the density of ULCC, where the density is reduced by about 15%. Despite the decreased mechanical strength with the use of CR, the ULCC still possess good flexural strength of 2.4 MPa without AEA. Furthermore, the effect of CR is more significant than AEA in improving the sound absorption average (SAA) of ULCC which the SAA of the control mix is increased by 61.3%. Overall, the combination of CR and AEA reduced the density and improved the acoustic performance of ULCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available