4.7 Article

Reliability-based seismic assessment of controlled rocking steel cores

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102623

Keywords

Controlled-rocking steel cores; Monte Carlo simulation; Probability failure; Reliability index; Sensitivity analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the seismic reliability of Controlled-rocking steel cores (CRSCs) through extensive nonlinear dynamic analyses considering various random variables. The results show that the design procedure is reliable and the safety of CRSCs is provided, with the probability of failure for mid-rise CRSCs higher than low-rise archetypes.
Controlled-rocking steel cores (CRSCs) effectively prevent earthquake-induced residual damage while may suffer large lateral displacements. This paper gives a particular emphasis on examining the seismic reliability of CRSCs. Accordingly, extensive nonlinear dynamic analyses are conducted for low-and mid-rise archetypes. A set of random variables (RV), including geometry parameters, material properties, and design details of post-tensioned cables (PTs) and energy dissipations (EDs), are considered for reliability assessment. The vectors of RVs are generated by Monte Carlo simulation for 5, 10, and 15% coefficient of variations. Considering uncertainty associated with RVs, peak displacement responses for CRSCs are determined under 44 far-field ground motions. The probability failure and reliability index are quantified for three performance levels, and sensitivity analysis is performed to measure the significance of RVs. Results indicate that the design procedure is reliable and the safety of CRSCs is provided; however, the probability failure for mid-rise CRSCs is more than low-rise archetypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available