4.7 Article

An integrated decision-making framework for existing building retrofits based on energy simulation and cost-benefit analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103200

Keywords

Energy retrofit; Existing building; Cost-benefit analysis; Energy model simulation; Multi-objective decision-making

Funding

  1. Shanghai Pujiang Program [2020PJD074]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52078374, 52108090, 71904032]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [22120210288]
  4. Postdoctoral International Exchange Program from China Postdoc Council
  5. Shanghai Jianfeng Yichang Engineering Technology Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a framework for decision-making on energy retrofits for institutional buildings in a tropical climate, with a detailed case study as demonstration. The results suggest that occupants-oriented retrofit options perform better in energy retrofit, and it is recommended to adopt multiple retrofit measures together to enhance cost-effectiveness.
Future city renewal and rejuvenation require a tremendous amount of existing building retrofits to improve energy efficiency for sustainable city development. Although energy retrofit has received much attention, there lacks a comprehensive workflow for institutional buildings in a tropical climate. This paper proposes an easy-tofollow framework for optimal decision-making of energy retrofit with a detailed case study on a multi-purpose building on the National University of Singapore campus. The framework integrates energy simulation, a hybrid approach to quantify retrofit benefits, cost contextualization procedure, standardized cost-benefit analysis plots and indicators, and a final decision matrix. Among the analyzed retrofit options, occupants-oriented retrofit options such as installing occupancy sensor for automatic lighting control, setting higher temperature setpoint, and lowering plug load, topped the selection with scores 8.63, 7.18, and 7.09 respectively, significantly outperforming the technological retrofit like replacing water-cooled chiller (score 3.19) and installing a green roof (score 1.42). Furthermore, taking multiple occupants-oriented retrofits together involves less cost per energy saving than taking each of them individually. This indicates that combined measures could augment the costeffectiveness of building energy retrofit. This work offers a hands-on framework for decision-making on energy retrofits and implications for developing more comprehensive guidelines for city renewal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available