4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical study of CO2 adsorption on copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (Cu-BTC) metal organic framework

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 859-863

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.09.036

Keywords

Cu-BTC; Adsorption; Grand canonical Monte Carlo; Electrostatic interactions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51322604, 51176149]
  2. National Key Projects of Fundamental R/D of China (973 Project) [2011CB610306]
  3. Open Funding Project of National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering [HF2013-K-05]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xjj2012102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The amount and isosteric heat of CO2 adsorption in copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (Cu-BTC) metal organic framework are synchronously experimentally studied with the combined PCTProE&E and Calvet Calorimeter under the ambient temperature of 35 degrees C and pressure range 0-1200 kPa. A grand canonical Monte Carlo numerical model is proposed to predict the CO2 adsorption amount combined with isosteric heat. The numerical model is validated with experimental data, and the obtained adsorption snapshots can provide a deep insight for the adsorption structure at molecular level. The CO2 adsorption amount and heat have three contributions: the Lennard-Jones potential, electrostatic interactions between CO2 and Cu-BTC, and electrostatic interactions between CO2 and CO2. The contribution rate ranges for the adsorption amount of the three mechanisms are 48.45-69.66%, 28.43-48.41%, and 1.91-3.14%, respectively. The third contribution can be ignored. The L-J potential controls the adsorbed CO2 molecules in the tetrahedron-shaped pockets of Cu-BTC, whereas the electrostatic interactions between CO2 and Cu-BTC control the adsorbed CO2 molecules in the larger square-shaped channels of Cu-BTC. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available