4.6 Article

Assessment of Operator Reliability in Ultrasound of the Median and Ulnar Nerve Using Bland-Altman Analysis

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112134

Keywords

nerve ultrasound; cross-sectional area; reliability; training effect; Bland-Altman agreement analysis

Funding

  1. Open Access Publication Funds of the Ruhr-University Bochum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate the level of agreement between operators with different expertise levels in nerve ultrasound. The results demonstrated higher precision in measurements by the experienced rater.
Currently, there is no standardized method to evaluate operator reliability in nerve ultrasound. A short prospective protocol using Bland-Altman analysis was developed to assess the level of agreement between operators with different expertise levels. A control rater without experience in nerve ultrasound, three novices after two months of training, an experienced rater with two years of experience, and a reference rater performed blinded ultrasound examinations of the left median and ulnar nerve in 42 nerve sites in healthy volunteers. The precision of Bland-Altman agreement analysis was tested using the Preiss-Fisher procedure. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation, and Bland-Altman limits of agreement were calculated. The sample size calculation and Preiss-Fisher procedure showed a sufficient precision of Bland-Altman agreement analysis. Limits of agreement of all trained novices ranged from 2.0 to 2.9 mm(2) and were within the test's maximum tolerated difference. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals of limits of agreement revealed a higher precision in the experienced rater's measurements. Operator reliability in nerve ultrasound of the median and ulnar nerve arm nerves can be evaluated with a short prospective controlled protocol using Bland-Altman statistics, allowing a clear distinction between an untrained rater, trained novices after two months of training, and an experienced rater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available