4.6 Article

Development of an Artificial Intelligence System for the Automatic Evaluation of Cervical Vertebral Maturation Status

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122200

Keywords

artificial intelligence; cervical vertebral maturation; skeletal age; deep learning; convolutional neural network; orthodontics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [82071147]
  2. Research Grant of Health Commission of Sichuan Province [19PJ233, 20PJ090]
  3. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018JY0558, 2021YJ0428]
  4. CSA Clinical Research Fund [CSA-02020-02]
  5. Research and Develop Program, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University [LCYJ2020-TD-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to develop an AI system for automatically determining CVM status, and found that the AI system showed good agreement with human examiners in terms of labelling error. Additionally, the AI system demonstrated good accuracy in CVM staging and achieved high F1 scores, indicating its reliability and usefulness in evaluating cervical vertebral maturation.
Background: Cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) is widely used to evaluate growth potential in the field of orthodontics. This study is aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system to automatically determine the CVM status and evaluate the AI performance. Methods: A total of 1080 cephalometric radiographs, with the age of patients ranging from 6 to 22 years old, were included in the dataset (980 in training dataset and 100 in testing dataset). Two reference points and thirteen anatomical points were labelled and the cervical vertebral maturation staging (CS) was assessed by human examiners as gold standard. A convolutional neural network (CNN) model was built to train on 980 images and to test on 100 images. Statistical analysis was conducted to detect labelling differences between AI and human examiners, AI performance was also evaluated. Results: The mean labelling error between human examiners was 0.48 +/- 0.12 mm. The mean labelling error between AI and human examiners was 0.36 +/- 0.09 mm. In general, the agreement between AI results and the gold standard was good, with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value being up to 98%. Moreover, the accuracy of CVM staging was 71%. In terms of F1 score, CS6 stage (85%) ranked the highest accuracy. Conclusions: In this study, AI showed a good agreement with human examiners, being a useful and reliable tool in assessing the cervical vertebral maturation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available