4.6 Review

The Value of a Complete Blood Count (CBC) for Sepsis Diagnosis and Prognosis

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101881

Keywords

biomarker; sepsis; CBC; CPD; thrombocytopenia; anemia; lymphocytes; neutrophils; monocytes; RBC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Complete blood count is a valuable test that provides a wealth of information on individual health status, guiding clinicians to early-identify patients at high risk of sepsis and predict adverse outcomes. It is cheap, easy-to-perform, and available in all wards, showcasing several advantages over other investigated biomarkers for sepsis.
Sepsis represents an important global health burden due to its high mortality and morbidity. The rapid detection of sepsis is crucial in order to prevent adverse outcomes and reduce mortality. However, the diagnosis of sepsis is still challenging and many efforts have been made to identify reliable biomarkers. Unfortunately, many investigated biomarkers have several limitations that do not support their introduction in clinical practice, such as moderate diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, long turn-around time, and high-costs. Complete blood count represents instead a precious test that provides a wealth of information on individual health status. It can guide clinicians to early-identify patients at high risk of developing sepsis and to predict adverse outcomes. It has several advantages, being cheap, easy-to-perform, and available in all wards, from the emergency department to the intensive care unit. Noteworthy, it represents a first-level test and an alteration of its parameters must always be considered within the clinical context, and the eventual suspect of sepsis must be confirmed by more specific investigations. In this review, we describe the usefulness of basic and new complete blood count parameters as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of sepsis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available