4.6 Article

Performance Analysis of the Technology of High-Temperature Boiler Feed Water to Recover the Waste Heat of Mid-Low-Temperature Flue Gas

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 6, Issue 40, Pages 26318-26328

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03465

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province [2019C03117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that using high-temperature boiler feed water in mid-low-temperature flue gas waste heat recovery system can effectively prevent low-temperature corrosion issues, providing a theoretical basis and engineering guidance for determining the optimal heat recovery strategy.
In coal-fired power plants, most of the working fluids used in a mid-low-temperature flue gas waste heat recovery system (FGWHRS) are low-temperature boiler supply air or condensate water in the flue gas condenser. This is prone to cause low-temperature corrosion, as the system temperature is lower than the acid dew point of the flue gas. In this study, an experimental apparatus was set up at the entrance of the desulfurization tower of a 330 MW unit in Xinjiang, China, which uses the technology of high-temperature boiler feed water (above 80 degrees C) to recover the waste heat of mid-low-temperature flue gas. The heat exchange performance of the mid-low-temperature FGWHRS was evaluated under different working conditions, and the optimal input parameters of the system for each considered working condition are given based on the analysis. It was found that the low-temperature corrosion in the system could be avoided using this technology. To eliminate low-temperature corrosion, the lowest temperature for the inlet water was predicted to be 69 degrees C in our study via curve fitting based on the experimental data. The results could provide a theoretical basis and engineering guidance for determining the best heat recovery strategy of mid-low-temperature FGWHRS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available