4.6 Article

Electrochemical Properties of Zn-Al-La Layered Double Hydroxides in Zn-Ni Secondary Batteries

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 6, Issue 51, Pages 35244-35249

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02089

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774160]
  2. ten thousand people plan of Yunnan Province [YNWR-QNBJ-2018-327]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research on Zn-Al-La layered double hydroxides prepared by the hydrothermal method and used as a new anodic material for Zn-Ni secondary batteries showed that the material exhibited good crystallinity and uniform dispersion, with excellent cycle reversibility and corrosion resistance when applied to Zn-Ni batteries. The electrode also demonstrated outstanding cycle stability after 150 cycles, with a cycle retention rate reaching 91.63%.
Zn-Al-La layered double hydroxides (LDHs) were prepared by the hydrothermal method and used as a new anodic material for Zn-Ni secondary batteries. The morphology and microstructure of Zn-Al-La-LDHs were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The electrochemical properties of Zn-Al-La-LDHs as negative electrode materials for Zn-Ni batteries were studied by the cyclic voltammetry, Tafel polarization curve, and constant current charge-discharge test. XRD and SEM analysis showed that the crystallinity of the prepared Zn-Al-La-LDHs was good and the dispersion was uniform and showed regular hexagonal structures. The results of electrical properties show that Zn-Al-La-LDHs have good cycle reversibility and corrosion resistance when applied to Zn-Ni secondary batteries. The analysis of galvanostatic charge-discharge measurement results shows that the Zn-Al-La-LDH electrode has excellent cycle stability and charge-discharge characteristics. After 150 cycles, the cycle retention rate can reach 91.63%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available