4.6 Article

DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C-H Allylation, C-H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06584

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22003045, 21773010]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Tianjin Colleges [2018KJ171]
  3. High-Performance Computing Platform of Tianjin Chengjian University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional calculations were carried out to understand the mechanism of ruthenium-catalyzed C-H allylation. The study reveals the sequential processes involved in the reaction and identifies the rate-determining step as C-H activation. Additional calculations explored other reaction pathways between arenes and alkenes.
Density functional calculations at the B3LYP-D3+IDSCRF/TZP-DKH(-dfg) level of theory have been performed to understand the mechanism of ruthenium-catalyzed C-H allylation reported in the literature in depth. The plausible pathway consisted of four sequential processes, including C-H activation, migratory insertion, amide extrusion, and recovery of the catalyst, in which C- H activation was identified as the rate-determining step. The amide extrusion step could be promoted kinetically by trifluoroacetic acid since its mediation lowered the free-energy barrier from 32.1 to 12.2 kcal/mol. Additional calculations have been performed to explore other common pathways between arenes and alkenes, such as C-H alkenylation and hydroarylation. A comparison of the amide extrusion and beta-H elimination steps established the following reactivity sequence of the leaving groups: protonated amide group > beta-H group > unprotonated amide group. The suppression of hydroarylation was attributed to the sluggishness of the Ru-C protonation step as compared to the amide extrusion step. This study can unveil factors favoring the C-H allylation reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available