4.6 Article

Release of an Encapsulated Peptide from Carbon Nanotubes Driven by Electric Fields: A Molecular Dynamics Study

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 6, Issue 41, Pages 27485-27490

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04436

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY19B060002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the successful release of protein/peptide molecules from CNTs depends on the pore width, pore length, and net charges on the peptide, with external electric fields assisting in overcoming potential well barriers. Peptides with more net charges are more likely to be released effectively through the use of electric fields.
Targeted drug delivery into cells has been of tremendous scientific interest, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can be deemed as a promising material for the loading and unloading of drugs. One of the major challenges is the release of drugs from CNTs, which have a great potential well to trap molecules. By performing molecular dynamics simulations, this work attempts to study the releasing process of encapsulated protein/peptide molecules from CNTs in the presence of uniform electric fields. Zadaxin serves as a model for protein/peptide drugs. External electric fields can assist the peptide in overcoming the potential well during its release. It is found that successful release of the peptide depends on the pore width, the pore length, and the net charges on the peptide. The peptide is less likely to be released either from CNTs with a smaller pore diameter due to a deeper potential well of the tubes or from CNTs with a longer pore length due to a broader and deeper potential well. Peptides with more net charges are ideal for the releasing process driven by electric fields. This work can provide insights into the design of an optimal tube size for effective release of a given protein/peptide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available