Journal
PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10122639
Keywords
aquatic plants; Araceae; duckweeds; Lemnoideae; molecular phylogenetics; taxonomy
Categories
Funding
- DFG (German Research Foundation) [393148499]
- Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Greifswald
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The classification of duckweeds as a subfamily of the expanded family Araceae rather than a separate family has sparked debates in the field of botanical taxonomy. The proposal to restore the subfamily Orontioideae to family status as Orontiaceae aims to maintain stability and utility in plant classification.
Duckweeds comprise a distinctive clade of pleustophytic monocots that traditionally has been classified as the family Lemnaceae. However, molecular evidence has called into question their phylogenetic independence, with some authors asserting instead that duckweeds should be reclassified as subfamily Lemnoideae of an expanded family Araceae. Although a close phylogenetic relationship of duckweeds with traditional Araceae has been supported by multiple studies, the taxonomic disposition of duckweeds must be evaluated more critically to promote nomenclatural stability and utility. Subsuming duckweeds as a morphologically incongruent lineage of Araceae effectively eliminates the family category of Lemnaceae that has been widely used for many years. Instead, we suggest that Araceae subfamily Orontioideae should be restored to family status as Orontiaceae, which thereby would enable the recognition of three morphologically and phylogenetically distinct lineages: Araceae, Lemnaceae, and Orontiaceae.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available