4.7 Article

Optimization of Deep Eutectic Solvent Extraction of Phenolic Acids and Tannins from Alchemilla vulgaris L.

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11040474

Keywords

Alchemilla vulgaris L; optimization; gallic acid; ellagic acid; hydrolyzable tannins; extraction

Categories

Funding

  1. Croatian Government
  2. European Union [KK.01.2.2.03, KK.01.1.1.02.0010]
  3. CEKOM 3LJ [KK.01.2.2.03.0017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study extracted gallic acid, ellagic acid, and hydrolyzable tannins (HT) from Alchemilla vulgaris L. plant using different deep eutectic solvents (DESs). Choline chloride:urea (1:2) was found to be the most suitable solvent. Extraction by stirring and heating was the most effective method for obtaining the highest amounts of gallic acid, ellagic acid, and HT.
Alchemilla vulgaris L. is a good source of antioxidant components with an emphasis on phenolic acids and tannins. In this study, gallic acid, ellagic acid, and hydrolyzable tannins (HT) were extracted from this plant with different deep eutectic solvents (DESs), varying the amount of added H2O, temperature and extraction time. Seventeen DESs (n = 3) were used for the extraction, of which choline chloride:urea (1:2) proved to be the most suitable. The selection of the best solvent was followed by the examination of the influence of the extraction type and parameters using response surface methodology (RSM). Gallic acid content was in the range of 0.00-1.89 mu g mg(-1), ellagic acid content was 0.00-12.76 mu g mg(-1) and hydrolyzable tannin (HT) content was 3.06-181.26 mu gTAE mg(-1), depending on the used technique and the extraction conditions. According to the results, extraction by stirring and heating was the most suitable since the highest amounts of gallic acid, ellagic acid, and HT were extracted, and the obtained optimal values using response surface methodology (RSM) are confirmed by experimentally obtained values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available