4.7 Article

Rice husk and rice straw torrefaction: Properties and pyrolysis kinetics of raw and torrefied biomass

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101872

Keywords

Agricultural waste; Torrefaction; Pyrolysis kinetics; Isoconversional method

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [DUT20LAB304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Torrefaction is an effective pretreatment process for biomass, which can enhance energy density and reduce moisture and oxygen contents. The study showed that increasing torrefaction temperature decreased hemicellulose and cellulose contents, while the activation energy increased with torrefaction temperature.
Torrefaction is an effective pretreatment process of biomass to enhance energy density and reduce moisture and oxygen contents. The kinetics analysis is important to estimate the torrefaction efficiency and understand the thermal degradation characteristics of torrefied biomass. In this study, the pyrolysis kinetics (Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method, Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method, and Starink's method) of rice husk (RH), rice straw (RS), and their torrefied solid products were investigated under different heating rates. The results demonstrated that the increase of torrefaction temperature decreased the content of hemicellulose and cellulose. TG-FTIR and TG/DTG curves of RH and RS showed a right shift trend after torrefaction. The average activation energy calculated was 149.79 and 161.76 kJ mol(-1) for RH and RS pyrolysis. The activation energy of torrefied RH and RS showed an increasing trend with torrefaction temperature. According to the change of activation energy, the pyrolysis model of RH and RS was predicted by Z(alpha) master plots and compensation effect, respectively. Torrefaction could convert the First-order reaction model (F1) to nucleation and growth model (An) gradually for RH, and raise the reaction order of the pyrolysis reaction for RS. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available