4.6 Article

Integrated Geophysical Study of the Collision Between the North China Craton and the Yangtze Craton and Its Links With Craton Lithospheric Thinning

Journal

FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.796783

Keywords

North China Craton; Yangtze Craton; sulu orogenic belt; crustal structure; lithospheric thinning; wide-angle seismic survey

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42006070, 91858212, 42076068, 41210005]
  2. KMA Research Development Program [KMI 2018-02810]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the lithospheric thinning in the eastern North China Craton (NCC) and Yangtze Craton (YZC) and proposes a five-stage model for the collision between these two cratons, highlighting the dominant geodynamic mechanisms in each stage. The results suggest that the lithospheric thinning is a consequence of the collision and subduction processes.
Unlike stable cratons elsewhere in the world, the lithosphere is strongly thinned in the east of both the North China Craton (NCC) and the Yangtze Craton (YZC) compared with the west. We deployed four active-source onshore-offshore wide-angle seismic survey lines in the eastern NCC and YZC from 2010 to 2016 with the aim of revealing the mechanism of lithospheric thinning and the process of the collision between the NCC and YZC. We obtained high-resolution crustal P-wave velocity models for the eastern NCC and YZC based on seismic forward modeling, travel-time tomography, and finite-difference wave-field modeling. Based on our integrated geophysical study and previous work, we propose a five-stage model for the collision between the YZC and NCC, with different dominant geodynamic mechanisms in each stage. Our collision model shows that lithospheric thinning in the eastern NCC and YZC is a consequence of the NCC-YZC collision and subduction of the Pacific plate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available