4.6 Article

Sanguiin H-6 Fractionated from Cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus) Seeds Can Prevent the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Development during Wound Infection

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10121481

Keywords

methicillin-resistant S; aureus; biofilm; cloudberry; Rubus; ellagitannin

Funding

  1. VTT Innovation program iBEX, Innovative Business to solve Exponential problems
  2. University of Helsinki

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that sanguiin H-6 fractionated from cloudberry seeds has significant inhibitory effect on MRSA and can be used as a preventive measure for surgical site infections. Conversely, lambertianin C did not show any anti-MRSA activity.
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of surgical site infections and its treatment is challenging due to the emergence of multi-drug resistant strains such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Natural berry-derived compounds have shown antimicrobial potential, e.g., ellagitannins such as sanguiin H-6 and lambertianin C, the main phenolic compounds in Rubus seeds, have shown antimicrobial activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sanguiin H-6 and lambertianin C fractionated from cloudberry seeds, on the MRSA growth, and as treatment of a MRSA biofilm development in different growth media in vitro and in vivo by using a murine wound infection model where sanguiin H-6 and lambertianin C were used to prevent the MRSA infection. Sanguiin H-6 and lambertianin C inhibited the in vitro biofilm development and growth of MRSA. Furthermore, sanguiin H-6 showed significant anti-MRSA effect in the in vivo wound model. Our study shows the possible use of sanguiin H-6 as a preventive measure in surgical sites to avoid postoperative infections, whilst lambertianin C showed no anti-MRSA activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available