4.6 Article

Different Inhibitory Effects of Erythromycin and Chlortetracycline on Early Growth of Brassica campestris Seedlings

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10101273

Keywords

erythromycin (Ery); chlortetracycline (CTC); B; campestris; chloroplast; photosynthesis; molecular marker

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. [NRF-2020R1A2C1003313]
  3. [NRF-2021R1I1A1A01045128]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Veterinary antibiotics Ery and CTC negatively impact plant growth, reducing chlorophyll content, causing abnormal chloroplasts, and affecting photosynthetic efficiency and gene expression, independently influencing plant physiological activity.
Veterinary antibiotics, including erythromycin (Ery) and chlortetracycline (CTC), are often detected in agricultural land. Although these contaminants affect plant growth and development, their effects on crops remain elusive. In this study, the effects of Ery and CTC on plant growth were investigated and compared by analyzing transcript abundance in Brassica campestris seedlings. Treatment with Ery and/or CTC reduced chlorophyll content in leaves and photosynthetic efficiency. Examination of the chloroplast ultrastructure revealed the presence of abnormally shaped plastids in response to Ery and CTC treatments. The antibiotics produced similar phenotypes of lower accumulation of photosynthetic genes, including RBCL and LHCB1.1. Analysis of the transcript levels revealed that Ery and CTC differentially down-regulated genes involved in the tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway and primary root growth. In the presence of Ery and CTC, chloroplasts were undeveloped and photosynthesis efficiency was reduced. These results suggest that both Ery and CTC individually affect gene expression and influence plant physiological activity, independently of one another.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available