4.6 Article

Application of Bacteriophages on Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) Biofilm

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10111423

Keywords

biofilm; bacteriophages; Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC); biocontrol

Funding

  1. The Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences
  2. Universita degli Studi di Milano

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that using bacteriophages can effectively reduce the number of E. coli bacteria producing biofilms, thus improving food safety. Preventing biofilm formation is more effective than trying to remove pre-formed biofilms.
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli are pathogenic bacteria able to form biofilms both on abiotic surfaces and on food, thus increasing risks for food consumers. Moreover, biofilms are difficult to remove and more resistant to antimicrobial agents compared to planktonic cells. Bacteriophages, natural predators of bacteria, can be used as an alternative to prevent biofilm formation or to remove pre-formed biofilm. In this work, four STEC able to produce biofilm were selected among 31 different strains and tested against single bacteriophages and two-phage cocktails. Results showed that our phages were able to reduce biofilm formation by 43.46% both when used as single phage preparation and as a cocktail formulation. Since one of the two cocktails had a slightly better performance, it was used to remove pre-existing biofilms. In this case, the phages were unable to destroy the biofilms and reduce the number of bacterial cells. Our data confirm that preventing biofilm formation in a food plant is better than trying to remove a preformed biofilm and the continuous presence of bacteriophages in the process environment could reduce the number of bacteria able to form biofilms and therefore improve the food safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available