4.7 Article

The Investigation of Mycotoxins and Enterobacteriaceae of Cereal-Based Baby Foods Marketed in Turkey

Journal

FOODS
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10123040

Keywords

baby food; mycotoxins; microbiological analysis; LC-MS/MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzed 85 cereal-based baby foods with or without milk for mycotoxins, TAMB, and Enterobacteriaceae contamination. At least one mycotoxin was found in 69.41% of the samples, with STE and HT-2 being the most frequently detected. AFM1 was not detected in any baby foods with milk. TAMB and Enterobacteriaceae were isolated from 30.59% and 10.59% of the samples, respectively. The mycotoxin levels in the analyzed samples were compliant with the Turkish Food Codex.
In this study, a total of 85 cereal-based baby foods with or without milk (four different brands; A, B, C, and D) collected from Ankara local markets, Turkey were analyzed for mycotoxins, total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (TAMB), and Enterobacteriaceae contamination. Baby foods were analyzed for 12 toxicological important mycotoxins such as aflatoxin B1, B2, G1, and G2; fumonisin B1 and B2; ochratoxin A; sterigmatocystin (STE); deoxynivalenol (DON); zearalenone (ZON); and T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin by LC-MS/MS multi-mycotoxin method. In addition to these mycotoxins, the presence of aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) was investigated in baby foods containing milk. The classical culture method was used for microbiological analysis. Consequently, at least one mycotoxin was detected in 69.41% of the total samples. The most frequently detected mycotoxins were STE (34.12%) and HT-2 (34.12%). However, AFM1 was not detected in any of the baby foods containing milk. Also, TAMB and Enterobacteriaceae were isolated from 30.59% and 10.59% of samples, respectively. As a result, it was determined that the mycotoxin levels in the analyzed samples were in accordance with the mycotoxin levels specified in the Turkish Food Codex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available