4.6 Article

Nitrogen Availability Affects the Metabolic Profile in Cyanobacteria

Journal

METABOLITES
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo11120867

Keywords

cyanobacteria; nitrogen; metabolome; photosynthesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyanobacteria exhibit different metabolic profiles and growth rates depending on whether they are grown in NH4Cl or NaNO3 medium. The assimilation rate of nitrogen is higher in NH4Cl medium, leading to more abundant metabolites involved in the CBB cycle, glycolysis, TCA cycle, and amino acids. The GS-GOGAT cycle for nitrogen assimilation also varies between the two nitrogen sources.
Nitrogen is essential for the biosynthesis of various molecules in cells, such as amino acids and nucleotides, as well as several types of lipids and sugars. Cyanobacteria can assimilate several forms of nitrogen, including nitrate, ammonium, and urea, and the physiological and genetic responses to these nitrogen sources have been studied previously. However, the metabolic changes in cyanobacteria caused by different nitrogen sources have not yet been characterized. This study aimed to elucidate the influence of nitrate and ammonium on the metabolic profiles of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. When supplemented with NaNO3 or NH4Cl as the nitrogen source, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 grew faster in NH4Cl medium than in NaNO3 medium. Metabolome analysis indicated that some metabolites in the CBB cycle, glycolysis, and TCA cycle, and amino acids were more abundant when grown in NH4Cl medium than NaNO3 medium. N-15 turnover rate analysis revealed that the nitrogen assimilation rate in NH4Cl medium was higher than in NaNO3 medium. These results indicate that the mechanism of nitrogen assimilation in the GS-GOGAT cycle differs between NaNO3 and NH4Cl. We conclude that the amounts and biosynthetic rate of cyanobacterial metabolites varies depending on the type of nitrogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available