4.5 Article

The Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Line COLO-680N Fails to Support Sustained Cryptosporidium parvum Proliferation

Journal

PATHOGENS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11010049

Keywords

Cryptosporidium parvum; cell culture; COLO-680N; immunofluorescence; qPCR

Categories

Funding

  1. LOEWE Centre DRUID (Novel Drug Targets against Poverty-Related and Neglected Tropical Infectious Diseases [project D4])
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01DG20023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports a decrease in the proliferation of C. parvum using the Kollitsch strain in a COLO-680N cell line culture system after the second day post infection. The findings highlight the importance of reproducibility in in vitro systems for research on cryptosporidiosis.
Cryptosporidium parvum is an important diarrhoea-associated protozoan, which is difficult to propagate in vitro. In 2017, a report described a continuous culture of C. parvum Moredun strain, in the oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line COLO-680N, as an easy-to-use system for C. parvum propagation and continuous production of oocysts. Here, we report that-using the Kollitsch strain of C. parvum-even though COLO-680N cells, indeed, allowed parasite invasion and early asexual parasite replication, C. parvum proliferation decreased after the second day post infection. Considering recurring studies, reporting on successful production of newly generated Cryptosporidium oocysts in the past, and the subsequent replication failure by other research groups, the current data stand as a reminder of the importance of reproducibility of in vitro systems in cryptosporidiosis research. This is of special importance since it will only be possible to develop promising strategies to fight cryptosporidiosis and its ominous consequences for both human and animal health by a continuous and reliable methodological progress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available