4.5 Article

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SN16-1-Induced Resistance System of the Tomato against Rhizoctonia solani

Journal

PATHOGENS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11010035

Keywords

biocontrol; plant defense; beneficial bacteria; RAN-Seq; plant-microbe interaction

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0200400, 21YF1410100]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China [18391902500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SN16-1 can assist tomato in resisting Rhizoctonia solani infection by activating the plant's defense mechanisms. SN16-1 activates the tomato's defenses through systemic-acquired resistance, rather than the classic induction of systemic resistance. The response of tomatoes to SN16-1 and R. solani RS520 also differs significantly.
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), as an important economical vegetable, is often infected with Rhizoctonia solani, which results in a substantial reduction in production. Therefore, the molecular mechanism of biocontrol microorganisms assisting tomato to resist pathogens is worth exploring. Here, we use Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SN16-1 as biocontrol bacteria, and employed RNA-Seq technology to study tomato gene and defense-signaling pathways expression. Gene Ontology (GO) analyses showed that an oxidation-reduction process, peptidase regulator activity, and oxidoreductase activity were predominant. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses showed that phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, aldosterone synthesis and secretion, and phototransduction were significantly enriched. SN16-1 activated defenses in the tomato via systemic-acquired resistance (which depends on the salicylic acid signaling pathway), rather than classic induction of systemic resistance. The genes induced by SN16-1 included transcription factors, plant hormones (ethylene, auxin, abscisic acid, and gibberellin), receptor-like kinases, heat shock proteins, and defense proteins. SN16-1 rarely activated pathogenesis-related proteins, but most pathogenesis-related proteins were induced in the presence of the pathogens. In addition, the molecular mechanisms of the response of tomatoes to SN16-1 and R. solani RS520 were significantly different.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available