4.7 Article

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of a dish-Stirling Concentrating Solar Power Plant in the Mediterranean area

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101444

Keywords

LCSA; dish-Stirling; Concentrating Solar Power; LCA; Renewable energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solar energy has the highest potential among renewable energy sources to meet future energy demands with lower emissions. The dish-Stirling technology, while efficient, poses environmental challenges in production and installation, prompting a comprehensive assessment of its sustainability in three dimensions.
Among the different renewable energy sources, solar energy shows the highest exploitation potential to satisfy a substantial portion of the worlds' future energy demand, guaranteeing at the same time lower emissions than conventional energy providers. Much of this potential is usable thanks to Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) technologies, of which the dish-Stirling concentrator is the most efficient. Nevertheless, the production and installation phases of the dish-Stirling technology can have an environmental impact which motivated the assessment of the plant in the three dimensions of sustainability (environmental, economic and social). The present publication evaluated an existing dish-Stirling plant located in Italy with a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. The Life Cycle Assessment resulted in the emission of 35 tons of CO(2)e. The main drivers of emissions were the electronic components (16%) and the steel used for the structure (37%). Life Cycle Costing resulted in total costs of 308,467(sic). S-LCA resulted in working seconds for skilled and unskilled workers equal to 1,454,400 s and 1,713,600 s, respectively. The main challenges that were identified for this work were the data availability for all pillars and the comparability between the actual study and the publications already available in the relevant literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available