4.7 Article

Energy and environmental impact assessment of Indian rice straw for the production of second-generation bioethanol

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101546

Keywords

Rice straw; Pretreatment technologies; Impact assessment; Second-generation bioethanol; Greenhouse gas emissions

Funding

  1. CONVERB, a joint (EU-India) R&D project under the INNO INDIGO partnership program - Academy of Finland (AKA) [311972]
  2. Department of Science & Technology (DST), Govt. of India [DST/IMRCD/INNO-INDIGO/CONVER-B/2017]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [311972] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the potential of surplus rice straw (SRS) for second-generation (2G) bioethanol production, renewable electricity generation, and greenhouse gas emissions reduction in India. Results showed that the availability of SRS and the choice of pretreatment method are crucial factors in determining its potential. Under the benchmark scenario for 2030-31, significant reductions in GHG emissions were achieved when generating renewable electricity replaces conventional grid electricity.
This study assessed the energy and environmental impacts in terms of second-generation (2G) bioethanol production, renewable electricity generation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction potential of surplus rice straw (SRS) in India. National rice production database, and standard procedures for life cycle assessment of rice straw to 2G bioethanol production using two different pretreatment technologies namely, dilute acid (DA) and steam explosion (SE) pretreatments were explored for the analysis. Two scenarios (benchmark and resource efficient) were constructed to evaluate the availability of SRS and to determine the potential from 2020 to 21 to 2030-31. Under benchmark for the year 2030-31, the potential from SRS using DA and SE pretreatment methods for the production of 2G bioethanol and the surplus renewable electricity generation were estimated to be 10,547 and 11,165 million L; and 5295 and 6928 GWh, respectively, and the corresponding GHG emissions reduction potential were assessed to be 11,954 and 14,375 kt CO(2)eq., respectively while generated renewable electricity replaces crude oil-driven grid electricity, and 11,498 and 14,498 kt CO(2)eq., respectively while generated renewable electricity replaces coal-driven grid electricity. The study revealed that both the availability of SRS and the choice of pretreatment method play decisive roles in the determination of its potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available